Post of infinite hate
Mar. 20th, 2009 10:26 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So the grand finale of the show is a handful of white guys, mostly old, looking at the "Natives" and joking about breeding with them. And again, when the decision is made to abandon their physical culture, technology, and displace the current inhabitants of ReallyEarthThisTime, it's still a mostly male planning-group. Yes, tell me again how this show is arguably non-racist, non-misogynistic, or non-ageist.
Oh, and as to the interminable denouement? Fuck it. It's a litany of the bad choices everyone made before the apocalypse, and it's not explanatory, just embarrassing -- for the characters, the actors, and the creators.
I'm honestly trying to come up with my usual post-BSG-I-actually-watched attempt-at-comedy post, but nothin' doin'. The thing fucking makes fun of itself, and what little isn't second-to-second self-parody is just so infuriating as film making and politics that I can't seem to bring myself to engage with it in any mode but angry disdain.
As it actually ends, the one ray of hope is that given the hominids we saw, they're SO FAR BEFORE the agricultural revolution that they obviously all die out within a decade or two, century at most, and the non-invading hominids actually get their chance, rather than being replaced by obnoxious space-perverts.
OK ACTUAL ENDING IS AN ANTI-ROBOT MONTAGE!
Oh, and as to the interminable denouement? Fuck it. It's a litany of the bad choices everyone made before the apocalypse, and it's not explanatory, just embarrassing -- for the characters, the actors, and the creators.
I'm honestly trying to come up with my usual post-BSG-I-actually-watched attempt-at-comedy post, but nothin' doin'. The thing fucking makes fun of itself, and what little isn't second-to-second self-parody is just so infuriating as film making and politics that I can't seem to bring myself to engage with it in any mode but angry disdain.
As it actually ends, the one ray of hope is that given the hominids we saw, they're SO FAR BEFORE the agricultural revolution that they obviously all die out within a decade or two, century at most, and the non-invading hominids actually get their chance, rather than being replaced by obnoxious space-perverts.
OK ACTUAL ENDING IS AN ANTI-ROBOT MONTAGE!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 03:44 pm (UTC)The first season was actually pretty good to women--I loved Boomer, Athena (on the planet), Dualla (and her flirtations with Billy), and even the pre-Victorian-hysteric Cally, who just joined the military to pay for dental school. But as the show progressed it became like a sycophant at the Altar of Hegemonic Masculinity. All the "strong" women you see have just embraced the disturbing, destructive values of hegemonic masculinity, from trying to suppress/erase emotional responses, grossly out-of-porportion violence, and even RAPE OF WOMEN (Caine). By the end, the only women left were sexy robots. And women are continually punished for their bad choices (Ellen, Cally, Tory, Boomer) while the men consistently get away with it and are even sometimes later validated (Baltar, Tyrol, Tigh).
Honestly, given that, I think it should be just as offensive to men as it is to women. That particular brand of masculinity is something no one should be embracing.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 03:57 pm (UTC)I agree, but this is SF fandom. Hyper-masculine fascist militarism appeals strongly to disappointingly large numbers.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 05:04 pm (UTC)Agreed. I think that a lot of people don't look past "female character with lines" when determining if something is woman-positive. And even if for some reason you don't believe it's anti-feminist, I don't see how *anyone* could argue that it's not anti-feminine.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 08:39 pm (UTC)This is a problem because it implies that feminism is some kind of luxury, that works in a post-industrial world, but in extremis, it's back to rigid gender roles, or at least "masculine acts are effective, feminine acts are to be mocked".
no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 06:40 am (UTC)Absolutely agreed.
the fleet is obviously less than feminist
I'm not sure I agree with this, at least as per the fleet at the outset of the series. The fleet is clearly masculinized, but I'm not recalling clear evidence of the fleet being anti-feminist.
I think the show's biggest problems with the portrayal of women aren't, however, due to some sort of structures within the society that it depicts, but rather in the depiction itself and the characters the writers created.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 08:50 pm (UTC)BSG portrays a fictional setting that's still patriarchal (though dramatically less so than the early 1960s setting of Mad Men), but seems unaware of its patriarchalism, and the writers ask us to pretend that this lesser degree of patriarchy constitutes the absence of patriarchy.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 02:19 am (UTC)From the point of view of second-wave feminism, on the other hand, the show looks pretty retrograde. Remember the abortion episode, where the female president is willing to toss away the reproductive freedom of the fleet's women?
I can't really disentangle myself enough from my male and middle-class privilege so as to have an opinion about whether the show is feminist from the perspective of third-wave feminism.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 06:52 am (UTC)I think that any reasonable definition of feminism requires that in order for a work to be feminist, it must at the very least present a positive view of independent, empowered, non-masculinized women without relying on stereotypical gender roles or other patriarchical tropes. BSG pretty clearly fails on this test without worrying much about exactly how to slice what bits and pieces of it are and aren't anti-feminist.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-22 07:48 pm (UTC)No, that's what I was getting at in my last paragraph. I don't even understand what third-wave feminism is supposed to be.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 04:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 07:22 pm (UTC)RAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEE!
no subject
Date: 2009-03-21 07:28 pm (UTC)